<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 299 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal as there was no rebuttal to the detailed evidence provided by the respondents showing that the duty was not recovered from customers. The principle of unjust enrichment was found not applicable in this case, and the dispute over the refund of excess duty paid was settled in favor of the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 299 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal as there was no rebuttal to the detailed evidence provided by the respondents showing that the duty was not recovered from customers. The principle of unjust enrichment was found not applicable in this case, and the dispute over the refund of excess duty paid was settled in favor of the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>