https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309511 In CRP (PD) No. 1200 of 2009, the revision petitioners sought to reject the right of the first respondent to cross-examine a witness in a partition suit. The trial court allowed the cross-examination, but the High Court set aside this decision, remitting the matter for fresh consideration due to the failure to consider all relevant pleadings. In CRP (PD) No. 1273 of 2009, the trial court granted an ex parte injunction without providing reasons, leading the High Court to set aside the order and direct reconsideration within thirty days. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Sep 2023 16:05:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309511 In CRP (PD) No. 1200 of 2009, the revision petitioners sought to reject the right of the first respondent to cross-examine a witness in a partition suit. The trial court allowed the cross-examination, but the High Court set aside this decision, remitting the matter for fresh consideration due to the failure to consider all relevant pleadings. In CRP (PD) No. 1273 of 2009, the trial court granted an ex parte injunction without providing reasons, leading the High Court to set aside the order and direct reconsideration within thirty days. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309511