https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309512 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that defendants who supported the plaintiff's suit in their written statement do not have the right to cross-examine the plaintiff. Allowing such cross-examination was deemed unnecessary harassment to the plaintiff. Consequently, the court allowed the revision petition, disallowing defendants from cross-examining the plaintiff, with no costs imposed. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Sep 2023 16:05:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309512 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that defendants who supported the plaintiff's suit in their written statement do not have the right to cross-examine the plaintiff. Allowing such cross-examination was deemed unnecessary harassment to the plaintiff. Consequently, the court allowed the revision petition, disallowing defendants from cross-examining the plaintiff, with no costs imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309512