<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 307 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33902</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for C &amp; F services used in CHA work for export clearances by a 100% EOU was allowed because the place of removal, in FOB or C &amp; F export situations, was treated as the load port under the Board&#039;s circular and earlier Tribunal view. On that basis, the service tax on the impugned C &amp; F services qualified as eligible input service credit, and the disallowance was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 307 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33902</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on service tax paid for C &amp; F services used in CHA work for export clearances by a 100% EOU was allowed because the place of removal, in FOB or C &amp; F export situations, was treated as the load port under the Board&#039;s circular and earlier Tribunal view. On that basis, the service tax on the impugned C &amp; F services qualified as eligible input service credit, and the disallowance was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>