https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309509 The appeal challenging the timeliness of the petition for Letters of Administration was dismissed by the High Court. The court upheld the decision of the Additional District Judge, ruling that the petition filed after the withdrawal of a previous probate petition was timely. It was held that Article 137 of the Limitation Act does not apply to Probate/Letters of Administration proceedings, as the right to apply for Letters of Administration is a continuing right triggered by specific events. The court cited legal precedents to support the conclusion that the petition was within the three-year limitation period and deemed the appeal without merit. en-us Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Sep 2023 12:19:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309509 The appeal challenging the timeliness of the petition for Letters of Administration was dismissed by the High Court. The court upheld the decision of the Additional District Judge, ruling that the petition filed after the withdrawal of a previous probate petition was timely. It was held that Article 137 of the Limitation Act does not apply to Probate/Letters of Administration proceedings, as the right to apply for Letters of Administration is a continuing right triggered by specific events. The court cited legal precedents to support the conclusion that the petition was within the three-year limitation period and deemed the appeal without merit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309509