<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1285 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309508</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the application for interim injunction as the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case, did not disclose material facts, and was barred by the principle of res judicata. The court ordered the applicant to pay costs to the first respondent Bank.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 12:00:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1285 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309508</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the application for interim injunction as the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case, did not disclose material facts, and was barred by the principle of res judicata. The court ordered the applicant to pay costs to the first respondent Bank.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>