<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 184 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of excess stock and imposition of penalties, emphasizing strict liability in accounting for goods. Despite mitigating circumstances, the appellant&#039;s explanations for the excess stock were deemed unconvincing. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 1,60,000 to Rs. 75,000 and the penalty from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 2,000, considering the severity of the offense and the mitigating factors presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 184 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of excess stock and imposition of penalties, emphasizing strict liability in accounting for goods. Despite mitigating circumstances, the appellant&#039;s explanations for the excess stock were deemed unconvincing. The Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 1,60,000 to Rs. 75,000 and the penalty from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 2,000, considering the severity of the offense and the mitigating factors presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>