https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309507 The appeal was allowed, reversing the High Court of Appeal's decree. The First Court's decree was affirmed, and the respondent was directed to pay the appeal costs. The court stressed the necessity of proving fraud as charged and censured the judicial discretion in amending the plaint after the case had concluded. en-us Wed, 30 Mar 1887 00:00:00 +0521 Wed, 06 Sep 2023 11:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309507 The appeal was allowed, reversing the High Court of Appeal's decree. The First Court's decree was affirmed, and the respondent was directed to pay the appeal costs. The court stressed the necessity of proving fraud as charged and censured the judicial discretion in amending the plaint after the case had concluded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Mar 1887 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309507