https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309504 The Court upheld the decision of the lower court, dismissing the appeal and cross-objection. It confirmed the plaintiff's title to specified shares in the suit lands and ordered the defendant to render accounts for the period in question. The validity of the family arrangement was affirmed, rejecting claims of undue influence. The karta was held liable to account to coparceners, but money relief was denied without partition. The ruling emphasized the karta's control over assets in a joint Hindu family, preventing coparceners from recovering money without partition or removal of the karta. en-us Mon, 13 Jul 1942 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Sep 2023 11:38:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309504 The Court upheld the decision of the lower court, dismissing the appeal and cross-objection. It confirmed the plaintiff's title to specified shares in the suit lands and ordered the defendant to render accounts for the period in question. The validity of the family arrangement was affirmed, rejecting claims of undue influence. The karta was held liable to account to coparceners, but money relief was denied without partition. The ruling emphasized the karta's control over assets in a joint Hindu family, preventing coparceners from recovering money without partition or removal of the karta. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Jul 1942 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309504