<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (12) TMI 40 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309503</link>
    <description>A will is not invalidated by undue influence unless the person alleging it proves that pressure, fraud, coercion or importunity overbore the testator&#039;s free agency. On the evidence, the testator remained firm in his views and executed the will personally without the beneficiary&#039;s participation in its preparation or execution, so undue influence was not established. Due attestation may also be proved from the totality of the evidence, including circumstances showing execution and attestation at one sitting in the presence of the testator and witnesses. The absence of an express statement that the witnesses signed in the testator&#039;s presence was not decisive, and the probate was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 10:06:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (12) TMI 40 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309503</link>
      <description>A will is not invalidated by undue influence unless the person alleging it proves that pressure, fraud, coercion or importunity overbore the testator&#039;s free agency. On the evidence, the testator remained firm in his views and executed the will personally without the beneficiary&#039;s participation in its preparation or execution, so undue influence was not established. Due attestation may also be proved from the totality of the evidence, including circumstances showing execution and attestation at one sitting in the presence of the testator and witnesses. The absence of an express statement that the witnesses signed in the testator&#039;s presence was not decisive, and the probate was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>