https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309487 The court upheld the freezing of bank accounts under Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to suspicions of fund misuse and discrepancies. It ruled that prior notice to the account holders was not required, emphasizing the need to prevent evidence tampering. The investigation's findings supported continued freezing, highlighting the importance of uncovering the truth. The court dismissed the appeals, allowing for potential de-freezing post-investigation completion if no wrongdoing is found, stressing the importance of unhindered investigation for justice. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Sep 2023 08:52:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309487 The court upheld the freezing of bank accounts under Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to suspicions of fund misuse and discrepancies. It ruled that prior notice to the account holders was not required, emphasizing the need to prevent evidence tampering. The investigation's findings supported continued freezing, highlighting the importance of uncovering the truth. The court dismissed the appeals, allowing for potential de-freezing post-investigation completion if no wrongdoing is found, stressing the importance of unhindered investigation for justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309487