<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1199 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309491</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned orders, and remitted the matter back to the respondents for reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s SVLDRS application. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the claim in light of the circulars dated August 27, 2019, and December 12, 2019, the judgments of the court, and the observations made in the order, after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 08:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1199 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309491</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned orders, and remitted the matter back to the respondents for reconsideration of the petitioner&#039;s SVLDRS application. The court directed the respondents to reconsider the claim in light of the circulars dated August 27, 2019, and December 12, 2019, the judgments of the court, and the observations made in the order, after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>