<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2153 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309488</link>
    <description>The Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court does not become functus officio after an award becomes enforceable, retaining jurisdiction to consider applications to set aside ex parte awards. The Court emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s quasi-judicial functions, allowing it to exercise discretion judicially and set aside awards passed without sufficient cause for non-appearance. The conflicting views on the Tribunal&#039;s power to set aside ex parte awards were resolved, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s authority to rectify procedural errors and prevent injustice. Applications to set aside ex parte awards should be assessed on their merits, ensuring procedural fairness and industrial peace. The appeals were disposed of with directions for reconsideration of non-appearance causes and provisional payments to workmen, recognizing the Tribunal&#039;s role in upholding justice and industrial harmony.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 08:52:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2153 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309488</link>
      <description>The Industrial Tribunal/Labour Court does not become functus officio after an award becomes enforceable, retaining jurisdiction to consider applications to set aside ex parte awards. The Court emphasized the Tribunal&#039;s quasi-judicial functions, allowing it to exercise discretion judicially and set aside awards passed without sufficient cause for non-appearance. The conflicting views on the Tribunal&#039;s power to set aside ex parte awards were resolved, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s authority to rectify procedural errors and prevent injustice. Applications to set aside ex parte awards should be assessed on their merits, ensuring procedural fairness and industrial peace. The appeals were disposed of with directions for reconsideration of non-appearance causes and provisional payments to workmen, recognizing the Tribunal&#039;s role in upholding justice and industrial harmony.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>