<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1247 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309500</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax assessment order. The court found the Assessing Authority violated principles of natural justice by not providing mandatory oral hearing as required under Section 75(4) of U.P. GST Act. Order was set aside and matter remanded for fresh proceedings with proper opportunity for hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1247 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309500</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s challenge to tax assessment order. The court found the Assessing Authority violated principles of natural justice by not providing mandatory oral hearing as required under Section 75(4) of U.P. GST Act. Order was set aside and matter remanded for fresh proceedings with proper opportunity for hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>