<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 279 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442657</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found no error in the High Court&#039;s refusal of pre-arrest (anticipatory) bail after considering the circumstances and allegations, and declined to interfere with that assessment. The Special Leave Petition challenging the rejection of anticipatory bail was dismissed, leaving the High Court order intact and closing the pending applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 279 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442657</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found no error in the High Court&#039;s refusal of pre-arrest (anticipatory) bail after considering the circumstances and allegations, and declined to interfere with that assessment. The Special Leave Petition challenging the rejection of anticipatory bail was dismissed, leaving the High Court order intact and closing the pending applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>