<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 306 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33897</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeal by setting aside the impugned order due to a violation of principles of natural justice in the adjudication process. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, with the advocate undertaking to appear for a fresh hearing before the Commissioner. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, leaving all issues open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 306 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33897</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeal by setting aside the impugned order due to a violation of principles of natural justice in the adjudication process. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, with the advocate undertaking to appear for a fresh hearing before the Commissioner. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, leaving all issues open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>