<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 264 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442642</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the denial of the exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act due to violations of Sections 11(5) and 13(1)(d). The appellant&#039;s investment in HITEX and the commercial use of land were deemed contrary to the society&#039;s objectives, leading to the rejection of appeals. No costs were awarded, and any pending petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 264 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442642</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the denial of the exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act due to violations of Sections 11(5) and 13(1)(d). The appellant&#039;s investment in HITEX and the commercial use of land were deemed contrary to the society&#039;s objectives, leading to the rejection of appeals. No costs were awarded, and any pending petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>