<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 263 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442641</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues. Regarding section 68, the ITAT found the assessee had demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. On the gross profit restriction from URD purchases, the ITAT agreed with CIT (A) that the disclosed profit was sufficient, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 263 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442641</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal on both issues. Regarding section 68, the ITAT found the assessee had demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. On the gross profit restriction from URD purchases, the ITAT agreed with CIT (A) that the disclosed profit was sufficient, finding no substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>