<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 252 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442630</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the subscription revenue received by the assessee from Indian customers does not constitute &quot;royalty&quot; under the Income Tax Act and India-US DTAA. The fees were deemed not payment for the use of copyright, information concerning industrial experience, or granting any right to use equipment. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 08:50:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 252 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442630</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the subscription revenue received by the assessee from Indian customers does not constitute &quot;royalty&quot; under the Income Tax Act and India-US DTAA. The fees were deemed not payment for the use of copyright, information concerning industrial experience, or granting any right to use equipment. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>