<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 166 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33895</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the notification under Section 12 of the Central Excise Act, denied the quashing of search and seizure proceedings, show cause notice, and notification at the current stage, and deferred the decision on segregating liability and cross-examination rights for two companies to be determined during the ongoing adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 166 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33895</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of the notification under Section 12 of the Central Excise Act, denied the quashing of search and seizure proceedings, show cause notice, and notification at the current stage, and deferred the decision on segregating liability and cross-examination rights for two companies to be determined during the ongoing adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>