https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442622 The HC ruled that the continued detention of the petitioner's mobile phones by customs officials was illegal, as no notice was issued within the six-month period specified under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The phones, seized on 19.10.2022, should have been returned by 19.04.2023. The court ordered the respondents to return the mobile phones within one week, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to legal timelines and procedures to prevent arbitrary detention. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442622 The HC ruled that the continued detention of the petitioner's mobile phones by customs officials was illegal, as no notice was issued within the six-month period specified under Section 110(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The phones, seized on 19.10.2022, should have been returned by 19.04.2023. The court ordered the respondents to return the mobile phones within one week, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to legal timelines and procedures to prevent arbitrary detention. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442622