<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 237 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442615</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the rate of tax applicable at the time of service provision, not payment receipt, is relevant. The Circular stating the enhanced rate was deemed invalid. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision that the demand at the increased rate was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2023 08:49:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 237 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442615</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the rate of tax applicable at the time of service provision, not payment receipt, is relevant. The Circular stating the enhanced rate was deemed invalid. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s decision that the demand at the increased rate was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>