<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Call Option Exercise Valid Under Shareholders Agreement; &#039;Other Method&#039; Chosen for Arm&#039;s Length Price Determination.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71843</link>
    <description>TP Adjustment - Determination of ALP - The Appellant had acquired shares from the promoter (i.e. Viney Sagar Sahgal) by triggering call option in terms of Shareholders Agreement. There is nothing on record to show that the exercise of call option had no impact on the determination of sale price. - ‘Other Method’ be adopted as the most appropriate method - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 21:34:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 21:35:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Call Option Exercise Valid Under Shareholders Agreement; &#039;Other Method&#039; Chosen for Arm&#039;s Length Price Determination.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71843</link>
      <description>TP Adjustment - Determination of ALP - The Appellant had acquired shares from the promoter (i.e. Viney Sagar Sahgal) by triggering call option in terms of Shareholders Agreement. There is nothing on record to show that the exercise of call option had no impact on the determination of sale price. - ‘Other Method’ be adopted as the most appropriate method - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 21:34:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>