<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1293 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309483</link>
    <description>Tax deducted at source could not be withheld from compensation for acquisition of land unless the authority first determined whether the acquired land was agricultural and whether tax was actually deductible. The document stresses that the same issue had already been decided earlier and that the earlier ruling had to be followed unless set aside. It also notes that continued non-compliance with that ruling risked avoidable litigation and possible contempt consequences. The petitions were disposed of in line with the earlier ruling, and the authorities were directed to issue immediate instructions to ensure compliance and stop unlawful deduction and repetitive disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 16:33:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1293 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309483</link>
      <description>Tax deducted at source could not be withheld from compensation for acquisition of land unless the authority first determined whether the acquired land was agricultural and whether tax was actually deductible. The document stresses that the same issue had already been decided earlier and that the earlier ruling had to be followed unless set aside. It also notes that continued non-compliance with that ruling risked avoidable litigation and possible contempt consequences. The petitions were disposed of in line with the earlier ruling, and the authorities were directed to issue immediate instructions to ensure compliance and stop unlawful deduction and repetitive disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>