<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (5) TMI 71 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309481</link>
    <description>The court found the partnership deed illegal due to the unauthorized transfer of the route permit, rendering the suit for dissolution and rendition of accounts unmaintainable. The revision petition was allowed, setting aside the Sub-Judge&#039;s order. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Chief Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali and Justice Raja Jaswant Singh concurred with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 15:57:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (5) TMI 71 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309481</link>
      <description>The court found the partnership deed illegal due to the unauthorized transfer of the route permit, rendering the suit for dissolution and rendition of accounts unmaintainable. The revision petition was allowed, setting aside the Sub-Judge&#039;s order. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Chief Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali and Justice Raja Jaswant Singh concurred with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>