<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 900 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309480</link>
    <description>Sale certificates issued by a bank&#039;s authorised officer under the SARFAESI regime are chargeable with stamp duty and do not qualify for the Article 18 exemption applicable to certificates of sale issued by Civil Courts or Revenue Officers. Filing a copy in Book I where registration is not compulsory does not itself determine stamp-duty liability; stamp law must be applied independently when the instrument requires adjudication or is presented for registration. The document&#039;s label is not decisive, and a bank-authorised officer cannot be treated as a Civil or Revenue Court solely because the sale followed a public auction. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 15:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 900 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309480</link>
      <description>Sale certificates issued by a bank&#039;s authorised officer under the SARFAESI regime are chargeable with stamp duty and do not qualify for the Article 18 exemption applicable to certificates of sale issued by Civil Courts or Revenue Officers. Filing a copy in Book I where registration is not compulsory does not itself determine stamp-duty liability; stamp law must be applied independently when the instrument requires adjudication or is presented for registration. The document&#039;s label is not decisive, and a bank-authorised officer cannot be treated as a Civil or Revenue Court solely because the sale followed a public auction. The writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>