<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 1180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309477</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition in W.P.No.4088 of 2012, setting aside the cancellation letter issued by the Authorised Officer without jurisdiction. The court also directed the respondents to assist in updating revenue records as per the petitioner&#039;s entitlement. The writ petition in W.P.No.1937 of 2012 was disposed of with similar directions. The court dismissed the petition for perjury due to the absence of arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 14:23:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 1180 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309477</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition in W.P.No.4088 of 2012, setting aside the cancellation letter issued by the Authorised Officer without jurisdiction. The court also directed the respondents to assist in updating revenue records as per the petitioner&#039;s entitlement. The writ petition in W.P.No.1937 of 2012 was disposed of with similar directions. The court dismissed the petition for perjury due to the absence of arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>