https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309474 Section 34(3) limitation runs from receipt of the arbitral award, but where a valid Section 33 request is made, the later start date applies only if the tribunal corrects, interprets, or makes an additional award so that the original award is modified. If the Section 33 application is merely rejected without any such change, no fresh limitation period begins. The Court further stated that delay cannot be condoned beyond the statutory period under Section 34(3), except to the extent time is excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. On that basis, the Section 34 petition was held time-barred. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:59:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309474 Section 34(3) limitation runs from receipt of the arbitral award, but where a valid Section 33 request is made, the later start date applies only if the tribunal corrects, interprets, or makes an additional award so that the original award is modified. If the Section 33 application is merely rejected without any such change, no fresh limitation period begins. The Court further stated that delay cannot be condoned beyond the statutory period under Section 34(3), except to the extent time is excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. On that basis, the Section 34 petition was held time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309474