https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309474 The Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act as time-barred, emphasizing strict adherence to the prescribed time limits. The Court clarified that without modifications or corrections to the award, the originality remains intact, and the limitation period cannot be extended based on the rejection of an application under Section 33. The decision was in line with previous judgments highlighting limited scope for extending the limitation period unless exceptional circumstances under Section 14 of the Limitation Act exist. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:59:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309474 The Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitration award under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act as time-barred, emphasizing strict adherence to the prescribed time limits. The Court clarified that without modifications or corrections to the award, the originality remains intact, and the limitation period cannot be extended based on the rejection of an application under Section 33. The decision was in line with previous judgments highlighting limited scope for extending the limitation period unless exceptional circumstances under Section 14 of the Limitation Act exist. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309474