<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 358 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellants under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, from Rs. 5,00,000/- each to Rs. 2,50,000/- each. The appellants were found to have knowingly aided in transporting smuggled goods, leading to their liability for penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the seriousness of involvement in smuggling operations while considering the reduction in penalties to serve the ends of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 358 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, reducing the penalty imposed on the appellants under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, from Rs. 5,00,000/- each to Rs. 2,50,000/- each. The appellants were found to have knowingly aided in transporting smuggled goods, leading to their liability for penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the seriousness of involvement in smuggling operations while considering the reduction in penalties to serve the ends of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>