<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442582</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s approach for DCF valuation and directing re-computation of arm&#039;s length price for certain transactions. The Tribunal provided relief on the issue of notional interest and held that no adjustments could be made to the cost of purchase of equity shares.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 10:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 204 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442582</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal rejecting the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s approach for DCF valuation and directing re-computation of arm&#039;s length price for certain transactions. The Tribunal provided relief on the issue of notional interest and held that no adjustments could be made to the cost of purchase of equity shares.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>