<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 189 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442567</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the impugned judgment/order and stating that they would not interfere. They clarified that if an appeal against discharge in the predicate offence is allowed, the petitioner can seek revival of the proceedings, with pending applications to be disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 08:40:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 189 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442567</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the impugned judgment/order and stating that they would not interfere. They clarified that if an appeal against discharge in the predicate offence is allowed, the petitioner can seek revival of the proceedings, with pending applications to be disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>