<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 177 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442555</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA heard appeals by the Revenue regarding the valuation of lubricating oils and allied preparations under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for the years 2005 to 2008. The Tribunal determined that the valuation should be based on the normal transaction value after allowing deductions for cash discounts, quantity discounts, and PME, but not for distributors&#039; discounts. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, concluding that the distributors were not acting as agents of the manufacturer. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the valuation method based on the normal transaction value with specified deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 08:39:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 177 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442555</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA heard appeals by the Revenue regarding the valuation of lubricating oils and allied preparations under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 for the years 2005 to 2008. The Tribunal determined that the valuation should be based on the normal transaction value after allowing deductions for cash discounts, quantity discounts, and PME, but not for distributors&#039; discounts. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, concluding that the distributors were not acting as agents of the manufacturer. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the valuation method based on the normal transaction value with specified deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>