https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442550 The court held that taxing 'Cutch' at the same rate as 'Kattha' before a specific amendment was incorrect and illegal. The judgment ordered the respondents to refund the tax collected on 'Cutch' during the specified period to the petitioner, along with interest. The court emphasized the Government's distinction between 'Kattha' and 'Cutch', rejecting the argument that 'Cutch' fell under the broader term of 'Kattha'. The decision was based on upholding the Government's recognition of 'Cutch' as a distinct product, leading to the refund of taxes collected erroneously. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2023 08:39:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442550 The court held that taxing 'Cutch' at the same rate as 'Kattha' before a specific amendment was incorrect and illegal. The judgment ordered the respondents to refund the tax collected on 'Cutch' during the specified period to the petitioner, along with interest. The court emphasized the Government's distinction between 'Kattha' and 'Cutch', rejecting the argument that 'Cutch' fell under the broader term of 'Kattha'. The decision was based on upholding the Government's recognition of 'Cutch' as a distinct product, leading to the refund of taxes collected erroneously. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442550