https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442549 The Supreme Court interpreted Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, stating that the limitation period for challenging arbitral awards starts from the date of correction and receipt of the corrected award. In this case, objections were filed within the prescribed time, falling within the limitation period. The High Court's decision to uphold the objections was affirmed by the Supreme Court, emphasizing the importance of timely filing objections and the court's discretion to condone delays. The special leave petition was dismissed, confirming the High Court's ruling on the limitation period for challenging arbitral awards. en-us Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2023 08:39:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442549 The Supreme Court interpreted Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, stating that the limitation period for challenging arbitral awards starts from the date of correction and receipt of the corrected award. In this case, objections were filed within the prescribed time, falling within the limitation period. The High Court's decision to uphold the objections was affirmed by the Supreme Court, emphasizing the importance of timely filing objections and the court's discretion to condone delays. The special leave petition was dismissed, confirming the High Court's ruling on the limitation period for challenging arbitral awards. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442549