<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1944 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309458</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for TDS on sub-contracts for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The ITAT upheld that there was no contractor-subcontractor relationship between the assessee, an Association of Persons (AOP), and its JV members, in line with previous decisions, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 21:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1944 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309458</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for TDS on sub-contracts for the Assessment Year 2011-12. The ITAT upheld that there was no contractor-subcontractor relationship between the assessee, an Association of Persons (AOP), and its JV members, in line with previous decisions, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>