<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1457 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309466</link>
    <description>A complainant or victim may seek directions for a fair and effective criminal investigation where the probe is delayed and remains directionless, and the writ court can intervene in such circumstances. The existence of proceedings under Section 156(3) CrPC did not bar the writ remedy because a Magistrate under that provision has limited power and cannot constitute a Special Investigation Team. An accused has no right to insist on a particular mode or agency of investigation. In intra-court appeal, the Single Judge&#039;s order was treated as a possible view, and the direction constituting the SIT was upheld while the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 21:32:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1457 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309466</link>
      <description>A complainant or victim may seek directions for a fair and effective criminal investigation where the probe is delayed and remains directionless, and the writ court can intervene in such circumstances. The existence of proceedings under Section 156(3) CrPC did not bar the writ remedy because a Magistrate under that provision has limited power and cannot constitute a Special Investigation Team. An accused has no right to insist on a particular mode or agency of investigation. In intra-court appeal, the Single Judge&#039;s order was treated as a possible view, and the direction constituting the SIT was upheld while the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>