https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309463 A litigant seeking writ relief must approach the Court with full candour and disclose all material facts. Where petitioners suppress relevant facts and rely on a truncated or misleading document, the Court may treat the conduct as an attempt to mislead and refuse to entertain the petition. In this commentary, the stated consequence is rejection of writ relief in a sensitive dispute and the imposition of exemplary costs for abuse of the writ process. The governing principle is that suppression of material facts and lack of bona fides can defeat maintainability and justify deterrent costs. en-us Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2023 21:32:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309463 A litigant seeking writ relief must approach the Court with full candour and disclose all material facts. Where petitioners suppress relevant facts and rely on a truncated or misleading document, the Court may treat the conduct as an attempt to mislead and refuse to entertain the petition. In this commentary, the stated consequence is rejection of writ relief in a sensitive dispute and the imposition of exemplary costs for abuse of the writ process. The governing principle is that suppression of material facts and lack of bona fides can defeat maintainability and justify deterrent costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309463