https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309450 Tamil Nadu Timber Transit Rules, 1968 were analysed as a statewide regulatory scheme for timber movement under the Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882. The rules were construed as within delegated rule-making power and not ultra vires. They were also treated as regulatory rather than prohibitive, so the pass and hammer-mark requirements were held to be reasonable restrictions under Article 19(1)(g) and not violative of Articles 301 to 304. The enhanced permit fee was upheld because the administration of transit controls and check-post services provided sufficient correlation to satisfy quid pro quo. en-us Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2023 16:33:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309450 Tamil Nadu Timber Transit Rules, 1968 were analysed as a statewide regulatory scheme for timber movement under the Tamil Nadu Forest Act, 1882. The rules were construed as within delegated rule-making power and not ultra vires. They were also treated as regulatory rather than prohibitive, so the pass and hammer-mark requirements were held to be reasonable restrictions under Article 19(1)(g) and not violative of Articles 301 to 304. The enhanced permit fee was upheld because the administration of transit controls and check-post services provided sufficient correlation to satisfy quid pro quo. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309450