https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309449 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 41-A under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulations) Rules, determining that it falls within the State Government's rule-making power and serves the Act's purpose of regulating cinematograph shows for public safety. The Court found that the restriction on the number of shows to four per day is reasonable and necessary, not unduly burdensome on the appellants' business rights. Citing precedent, the Court dismissed the appeals and writ petitions, concluding that Rule 41-A is constitutional and does not unreasonably restrict the appellants' rights under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2023 16:28:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309449 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Rule 41-A under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulations) Rules, determining that it falls within the State Government's rule-making power and serves the Act's purpose of regulating cinematograph shows for public safety. The Court found that the restriction on the number of shows to four per day is reasonable and necessary, not unduly burdensome on the appellants' business rights. Citing precedent, the Court dismissed the appeals and writ petitions, concluding that Rule 41-A is constitutional and does not unreasonably restrict the appellants' rights under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309449