<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442536</link>
    <description>The court found that subsequent attachment orders extending the attachment period had been issued, rendering the initial writ petitions infructuous. The court allowed the petitioners to challenge the later orders if needed, but ultimately closed the writ petitions without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 08:27:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 158 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442536</link>
      <description>The court found that subsequent attachment orders extending the attachment period had been issued, rendering the initial writ petitions infructuous. The court allowed the petitioners to challenge the later orders if needed, but ultimately closed the writ petitions without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>