<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Burden of Proof on Agency in Gold Smuggling Case; Jewelry Lacks Foreign Markings Indicating Import Origin.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71816</link>
    <description>Smuggling - Confiscation of gold / gold jewellery - burden to prove - on all the jewellery, there are no foreign markings and hence, there is no reasonable basis to conclude these to be of imported origin - the burden of proof does not shift to the appellants, but the burden lies on the investigating agency to prove that the seized jewellery were of foreign origin. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 08:26:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 08:26:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Burden of Proof on Agency in Gold Smuggling Case; Jewelry Lacks Foreign Markings Indicating Import Origin.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71816</link>
      <description>Smuggling - Confiscation of gold / gold jewellery - burden to prove - on all the jewellery, there are no foreign markings and hence, there is no reasonable basis to conclude these to be of imported origin - the burden of proof does not shift to the appellants, but the burden lies on the investigating agency to prove that the seized jewellery were of foreign origin. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2023 08:26:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=71816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>