https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442510 A commercial supply dispute did not disclose the ingredients of criminal breach of trust, cheating or forgery. For section 406, the materials showed a contractual business disagreement, but no entrustment of property or dishonest misappropriation. For section 420, there was no indication of deception or fraudulent intention at the inception of the transaction, only a later soured commercial relationship. For section 468, the allegations about use of a logo or emblem were omnibus and lacked specific particulars to satisfy the statutory ingredients. The proceeding was also viewed as a counterblast with an ulterior motive, and the complaint was quashed. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 03 Sep 2023 00:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442510 A commercial supply dispute did not disclose the ingredients of criminal breach of trust, cheating or forgery. For section 406, the materials showed a contractual business disagreement, but no entrustment of property or dishonest misappropriation. For section 420, there was no indication of deception or fraudulent intention at the inception of the transaction, only a later soured commercial relationship. For section 468, the allegations about use of a logo or emblem were omnibus and lacked specific particulars to satisfy the statutory ingredients. The proceeding was also viewed as a counterblast with an ulterior motive, and the complaint was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442510