<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1902 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the defective nature of the notice issued under Section 274. Relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity for clear grounds in penalty notices, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposition was unsustainable. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The judgment was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 8/12/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 21:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1902 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was invalid due to the defective nature of the notice issued under Section 274. Relying on precedents emphasizing the necessity for clear grounds in penalty notices, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty imposition was unsustainable. Consequently, the penalty was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The judgment was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 8/12/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>