<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1272 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309437</link>
    <description>Section 9 interim relief was held unavailable to restrain termination of a determinable supply-cum-works contract where substantial work remained incomplete, cure notice had been issued, and damages were an adequate remedy. The Court further held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees could not be stopped absent egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice of an irreversible kind; contractual disputes and arbitration proceedings were insufficient. On the contract documents and conduct, the obligation for right of way, land access, and related clearances was held to rest on the appellant, so the termination was not vitiated. The Electricity Act and telegraph powers arrangement did not invalidate the supplementary agreements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 21:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1272 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309437</link>
      <description>Section 9 interim relief was held unavailable to restrain termination of a determinable supply-cum-works contract where substantial work remained incomplete, cure notice had been issued, and damages were an adequate remedy. The Court further held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees could not be stopped absent egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice of an irreversible kind; contractual disputes and arbitration proceedings were insufficient. On the contract documents and conduct, the obligation for right of way, land access, and related clearances was held to rest on the appellant, so the termination was not vitiated. The Electricity Act and telegraph powers arrangement did not invalidate the supplementary agreements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>