<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1451 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309440</link>
    <description>The Court affirmed the existence of a binding extradition treaty between India and Chile, citing historical documents and legal provisions. It upheld the validity of the provisional arrest under the Extradition Act, 1962, based on an urgent request from the Chilean Embassy. The principle of reciprocity in extradition was recognized even in the absence of a specific treaty. The Court deemed the Government&#039;s decision to apply the Extradition Act to Chile as a political matter not subject to judicial review. While critiquing the Ministry of External Affairs for inaccurate information dissemination, the Court dismissed the petition and appeal, leaving the extradition proceedings to the lower court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 21:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1451 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309440</link>
      <description>The Court affirmed the existence of a binding extradition treaty between India and Chile, citing historical documents and legal provisions. It upheld the validity of the provisional arrest under the Extradition Act, 1962, based on an urgent request from the Chilean Embassy. The principle of reciprocity in extradition was recognized even in the absence of a specific treaty. The Court deemed the Government&#039;s decision to apply the Extradition Act to Chile as a political matter not subject to judicial review. While critiquing the Ministry of External Affairs for inaccurate information dissemination, the Court dismissed the petition and appeal, leaving the extradition proceedings to the lower court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>