<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 177 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33867</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed the stay application and remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) to adjudicate the appeal on its merits without requiring additional pre-deposits. The Tribunal found that the original authority had not properly addressed the challenge to the service tax and penalties imposed, and since the appellants had already paid the full tax and interest, further pre-deposits were unnecessary. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 177 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33867</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed the stay application and remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) to adjudicate the appeal on its merits without requiring additional pre-deposits. The Tribunal found that the original authority had not properly addressed the challenge to the service tax and penalties imposed, and since the appellants had already paid the full tax and interest, further pre-deposits were unnecessary. The appeal was allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>