<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442507</link>
    <description>The HC rejected the petitioner&#039;s challenge to seizure and prohibition orders, finding non-compliance with legal requirements. The court directed the respondents to issue a notice requiring the petitioner to furnish necessary bond and security within 15 days. Upon satisfying the statutory conditions under Section 67(6) of CGST Act, 2017, the seized goods would be provisionally released.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442507</link>
      <description>The HC rejected the petitioner&#039;s challenge to seizure and prohibition orders, finding non-compliance with legal requirements. The court directed the respondents to issue a notice requiring the petitioner to furnish necessary bond and security within 15 days. Upon satisfying the statutory conditions under Section 67(6) of CGST Act, 2017, the seized goods would be provisionally released.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>