<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 150 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33863</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision to set aside penalties under sections 76 and 77 of the Act due to limitation issues. The Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s appeal against the setting aside of the service tax demand and penalty under section 76, noting no fraud, collusion, or intent to evade payment by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 150 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33863</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision to set aside penalties under sections 76 and 77 of the Act due to limitation issues. The Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s appeal against the setting aside of the service tax demand and penalty under section 76, noting no fraud, collusion, or intent to evade payment by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>