<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 94 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings, holding that the Assessing Officer cannot issue a notice under Section 148 to reopen the assessment based on the same facts previously scrutinized. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 60 lakhs as unexplained bank deposit under Section 69A was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 94 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings, holding that the Assessing Officer cannot issue a notice under Section 148 to reopen the assessment based on the same facts previously scrutinized. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the addition of Rs. 60 lakhs as unexplained bank deposit under Section 69A was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>