<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 91 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellant, a Customs House Agent, liable for negligence in facilitating the attempted export of Red Sanders Wood misdeclared as Royal Chimney. Despite no direct collusion being proven, the appellant&#039;s carelessness and failure to verify crucial details warranted a penalty of Rs. 50,000 under Section 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal was disposed of with the decision to uphold the penalty to serve the ends of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=724875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 91 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellant, a Customs House Agent, liable for negligence in facilitating the attempted export of Red Sanders Wood misdeclared as Royal Chimney. Despite no direct collusion being proven, the appellant&#039;s carelessness and failure to verify crucial details warranted a penalty of Rs. 50,000 under Section 114(1) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appeal was disposed of with the decision to uphold the penalty to serve the ends of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>